lonemagpie: guy from the cover of sanctuary (Default)
http://moronwatch.net/2014/01/free-speech-rape-threats-and-the-war-on-twitter.html

Very important piece for anyone who still doesn’t see how the British public is being programmed, or who doesn’t get how insidious the patriarchy’s role is when pretending to take the feminist side in the matter of free speech…
lonemagpie: are you afraid of your people yet? (v)
And, here we go... http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-25641801. Photo ID - which means those of us who don't drive and have expired passports cos of not travelling abroad lately are fucked. Which means it's really a scam to encourage folks to get some other form of photo ID card which will no doubt be announced by the government imminently.
lonemagpie: are you afraid of your people yet? (v)
http://www.chroniclelive.co.uk/news/north-east-news/wallsend-man-says-firm-didnt-5800802#.Uh-lqi4OCQ0.twitter

Basicallym ATOS cancel an interview with an apllicant for a job in their office because he's in a wheelchair and the lift doesn't go to their floor.
lonemagpie: are you afraid of your people yet? (v)
Important point - banning search terms from returning results will pretty much just prevent users from seeing news reports and debate about the subject...

http://www.forbes.com/sites/timworstall/2013/07/21/camerons-bizarre-warning-to-google-bing-and-yahoo-over-child-pornography/
lonemagpie: are you afraid of your people yet? (v)
Dear Mr C.A. Moron, Hate Mail, and others of similar ilk who seek to prevent adults from deciding what they can think: increasing censorship of pornography (which itself is is something of variable definition) *increases* real life sex crimes, not the other way round.

This has been repeatedly proved around the world. Thinking that removing porn from the internet (a physical impossibility anyway) will reduce rape or child abuse is like thinking that banning nicotine patches will reduce smoking, or that banning haircuts will reduce instances of having long hair...

Here's a clever plan - how about we do something that actually works correctly? Rather than the *exact fucking opposite* (see also C.A.Moron and Gormless George's growth-killing austerity programme.)

http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2010/11/101130111326.htm

http://www.hawaii.edu/PCSS/biblio/articles/1961to1999/1999-pornography-rape-sex-crimes-japan.html

http://phys.org/news187448961.html

And don't even get me started on what the "porn blocks" will really block.... (Clue- the current mobile blocking apps the government wants also block access to sexual health sites, left-leaning newspapers, and so on...)
lonemagpie: are you afraid of your people yet? (v)
Once again, the mind boggles. Until you see the words "Daily Mail" mentioned, then all is explained.

http://tompride.wordpress.com/2013/06/24/mark-littlewood-why-the-poor-should-have-their-ni-numbers-tattooed-on-their-forearms/

Somebody's obviously trying to start a competition with Richard Littlejohn to see who can be the most extremist cunt.
lonemagpie: are you afraid of your people yet? (v)
http://johnnyvoid.wordpress.com/2013/06/11/disagree-with-an-atos-decision-then-starve-say-dwp/

Basically, people wrongly declared fit for work will have to waive their benefits in order to appeal.

We can haz revoloshun nao, plz?
lonemagpie: are you afraid of your people yet? (v)
reaches a new low of bizarrity: Man born with no hands refused a visa because he can't give fingerprints. Apparently the UK authorities are unaware that footprints and ear-prints are equally individual alternatives.

http://www.eurasianet.org/node/66926

I really had to resist putting the 10Doc "what what what" icon for this cos it's so fucking bizarre

Profile

lonemagpie: guy from the cover of sanctuary (Default)
lonemagpie

September 2017

S M T W T F S
     12
3456789
1011 1213141516
171819202122 23
24252627282930

Syndicate

RSS Atom

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags